Coverart for item
The Resource A report of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the opinions of the judges thereof, in the case of Dred Scott versus John F.A. Sandford. December term, 1856, By Benjamin C. Howard

A report of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the opinions of the judges thereof, in the case of Dred Scott versus John F.A. Sandford. December term, 1856, By Benjamin C. Howard

Label
A report of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the opinions of the judges thereof, in the case of Dred Scott versus John F.A. Sandford. December term, 1856
Title
A report of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the opinions of the judges thereof, in the case of Dred Scott versus John F.A. Sandford. December term, 1856
Statement of responsibility
By Benjamin C. Howard
Contributor
Subject
Genre
Language
eng
Cataloging source
DLC
Index
no index present
Literary form
non fiction
http://library.link/vocab/relatedWorkOrContributorDate
  • 1806 or 1807-1857
  • 1791-1872
http://library.link/vocab/relatedWorkOrContributorName
  • Scott, Dred
  • Sanford, John F. A.
  • Howard, Benjamin C.
  • Lawson Library of Criminal Law and Criminology
http://library.link/vocab/subjectName
  • Scott, Dred
  • African Americans
  • Citizenship
  • Missouri compromise
Label
A report of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the opinions of the judges thereof, in the case of Dred Scott versus John F.A. Sandford. December term, 1856, By Benjamin C. Howard
Instantiates
Publication
Note
  • Reprinted from the Reports of the U.S. Supreme Court
  • "This case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Missouri. It was an action of trespass vi et armis instituted in the Circuit court by Scott against Sandford."--p. 396
  • The points brought into question in the Supreme Court were Negro citizenship and the jurisdiction of the Circuit court. The constitutionality of the Missouri compromise act was also considered
Carrier category
volume
Carrier category code
nc
Carrier MARC source
rdacarrier
Content category
text
Content type code
txt
Content type MARC source
rdacontent
Control code
5524919
Dimensions
24 cm
Extent
2 preliminary leaves, pages [393]-633.
Lccn
01009601
Media category
unmediated
Media MARC source
rdamedia
Media type code
n
Note
MU LAW: Lawson Library of Criminal Law and Criminology.
System control number
(WaOLN)878234
Label
A report of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the opinions of the judges thereof, in the case of Dred Scott versus John F.A. Sandford. December term, 1856, By Benjamin C. Howard
Publication
Note
  • Reprinted from the Reports of the U.S. Supreme Court
  • "This case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Missouri. It was an action of trespass vi et armis instituted in the Circuit court by Scott against Sandford."--p. 396
  • The points brought into question in the Supreme Court were Negro citizenship and the jurisdiction of the Circuit court. The constitutionality of the Missouri compromise act was also considered
Carrier category
volume
Carrier category code
nc
Carrier MARC source
rdacarrier
Content category
text
Content type code
txt
Content type MARC source
rdacontent
Control code
5524919
Dimensions
24 cm
Extent
2 preliminary leaves, pages [393]-633.
Lccn
01009601
Media category
unmediated
Media MARC source
rdamedia
Media type code
n
Note
MU LAW: Lawson Library of Criminal Law and Criminology.
System control number
(WaOLN)878234

Library Locations

    • St. Louis Mercantile LibraryBorrow it
      1 University Blvd, St. Louis, MO, 63121, US
      38.710138 -90.311107
Processing Feedback ...