The Resource Contrast-induced nephropathy : comparative effects of different contrast media, prepared for Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ; prepared by Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center ; investigators, John Eng, Rathan M. Subramaniam, Renee F. Wilson, Sharon Turban, Michael J. Choi, Allen Zhang, Catalina Suarez-Cuervo, Cheryl Sherrod, Susan Hutfless, Emmanuel E. Iyoha, Eric B. Bass

Contrast-induced nephropathy : comparative effects of different contrast media, prepared for Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ; prepared by Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center ; investigators, John Eng, Rathan M. Subramaniam, Renee F. Wilson, Sharon Turban, Michael J. Choi, Allen Zhang, Catalina Suarez-Cuervo, Cheryl Sherrod, Susan Hutfless, Emmanuel E. Iyoha, Eric B. Bass

Label
Contrast-induced nephropathy : comparative effects of different contrast media
Title
Contrast-induced nephropathy
Title remainder
comparative effects of different contrast media
Statement of responsibility
prepared for Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ; prepared by Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center ; investigators, John Eng, Rathan M. Subramaniam, Renee F. Wilson, Sharon Turban, Michael J. Choi, Allen Zhang, Catalina Suarez-Cuervo, Cheryl Sherrod, Susan Hutfless, Emmanuel E. Iyoha, Eric B. Bass
Creator
Contributor
Author
Issuing body
Sponsoring body
Subject
Genre
Language
eng
Summary
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the comparative effects of different types of contrast media with respect to the risk of developing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) by synthesizing the current literature. DATA SOURCES: We searched for original studies in MEDLINE(r), Embase(r), and the Cochrane Library through October 1, 2014. We also searched for studies in ClinicalTrials.gov and the Scopus database. METHODS: Two reviewers independently reviewed each article to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported on CIN-related outcomes in patients after receiving low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM) or iso-osmolar contrast media (IOCM). We included head-to-head comparisons of one LOCM versus another LOCM or of LOCM versus IOCM. (Only 1 IOCM is currently available in the United States.) For each study, one reviewer extracted the data and a second reviewer verified the accuracy. Both reviewers assessed the risk of bias for each study. Together, the reviewers graded the strength of evidence for the comparisons and outcomes of interest. We quantitatively pooled the results of studies that were sufficiently similar, using a 25-percent relative risk reduction as the threshold for a minimally important difference. RESULTS: We identified five RCTs that compared two or more LOCMs, including two studies of intra-arterial administration, two studies of intravenous administration, and one study examining both routes. We identified 25 RCTs that compared IOCM with LOCM, including 18 studies of intra-arterial administration and 7 studies of intravenous administration. No study comparing LOCMs reported a statistically significant or clinically important difference between study arms, and the overall analysis did not suggest that any one LOCM was superior to another. In a meta-analysis, we found a borderline significant reduction in short-term CIN risk with IOCM compared with a diverse group of LOCMs (pooled relative risk, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 0.99, p=0.045). When the analysis was stratified by route of administration, the aggregate pooled relative risk was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.64 to 1.01) for intra-arterial and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.42 to 1.71) for intravenous. In studies that investigated IOCM versus LOCM, the outcomes of mortality, cardiovascular outcomes, need for renal replacement therapy, and imaging quality or diagnostic accuracy showed no significant difference between groups. One study comparing different LOCMs investigated the outcomes of death and adverse events, and found no difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found low strength of evidence that the risk of CIN did not differ between LOCMs, and moderate strength of evidence that IOCM had a slightly lower risk of CIN than LOCM. The lower risk was not clinically important and just reached statistical significance
Member of
Cataloging source
NLM
http://library.link/vocab/creatorName
Eng, John
Funding information
Prepared for Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ; prepared by Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center
Government publication
federal national government publication
Illustrations
illustrations
Index
no index present
Literary form
non fiction
Nature of contents
  • dictionaries
  • surveys of literature
NLM call number
WJ 342
http://library.link/vocab/relatedWorkOrContributorName
  • United States
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Effective Health Care Program (U.S.)
Series statement
  • Comparative effectiveness review
  • AHRQ publication
Series volume
  • number 155
  • no. 15(16)-EHC022-EF
http://library.link/vocab/subjectName
  • Acute Kidney Injury
  • Contrast Media
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research
Label
Contrast-induced nephropathy : comparative effects of different contrast media, prepared for Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ; prepared by Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center ; investigators, John Eng, Rathan M. Subramaniam, Renee F. Wilson, Sharon Turban, Michael J. Choi, Allen Zhang, Catalina Suarez-Cuervo, Cheryl Sherrod, Susan Hutfless, Emmanuel E. Iyoha, Eric B. Bass
Instantiates
Publication
Carrier category
online resource
Carrier category code
cr
Carrier MARC source
rdacarrier
Content category
  • text
  • still image
Content type code
  • txt
  • sti
Content type MARC source
  • rdacontent
  • rdacontent
Control code
945025772
Extent
1 online resource ((various pagings)
Form of item
online
Media category
computer
Media MARC source
rdamedia
Media type code
c
Other physical details
illustrations.
Specific material designation
remote
System control number
(OCoLC)945025772
Label
Contrast-induced nephropathy : comparative effects of different contrast media, prepared for Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ; prepared by Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center ; investigators, John Eng, Rathan M. Subramaniam, Renee F. Wilson, Sharon Turban, Michael J. Choi, Allen Zhang, Catalina Suarez-Cuervo, Cheryl Sherrod, Susan Hutfless, Emmanuel E. Iyoha, Eric B. Bass
Publication
Carrier category
online resource
Carrier category code
cr
Carrier MARC source
rdacarrier
Content category
  • text
  • still image
Content type code
  • txt
  • sti
Content type MARC source
  • rdacontent
  • rdacontent
Control code
945025772
Extent
1 online resource ((various pagings)
Form of item
online
Media category
computer
Media MARC source
rdamedia
Media type code
c
Other physical details
illustrations.
Specific material designation
remote
System control number
(OCoLC)945025772

Library Locations

  • St. Louis Mercantile LibraryBorrow it
    1 University Blvd, St. Louis, MO, 63121, US
    38.710138 -90.311107
  • Thomas Jefferson LibraryBorrow it
    1 University Blvd, St. Louis, MO, 63121, US
    38.710138 -90.311107
  • University ArchivesBorrow it
    703 Lewis Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, US
  • University of Missouri-St. Louis Libraries DepositoryBorrow it
    2908 Lemone Blvd, Columbia, MO, 65201, US
    38.919360 -92.291620
  • University of Missouri-St. Louis Libraries DepositoryBorrow it
    2908 Lemone Blvd, Columbia, MO, 65201, US
    38.919360 -92.291620
  • Ward E Barnes Education LibraryBorrow it
    8001 Natural Bridge Rd, St. Louis, MO, 63121, US
    38.707079 -90.311355
Processing Feedback ...