The Resource Evaluating the engaged institution : the conceptualizations and discourses of engagement, by Victoria A. Steel, (electronic resource)
Evaluating the engaged institution : the conceptualizations and discourses of engagement, by Victoria A. Steel, (electronic resource)
Resource Information
The item Evaluating the engaged institution : the conceptualizations and discourses of engagement, by Victoria A. Steel, (electronic resource) represents a specific, individual, material embodiment of a distinct intellectual or artistic creation found in University of Missouri-St. Louis Libraries.This item is available to borrow from all library branches.
Resource Information
The item Evaluating the engaged institution : the conceptualizations and discourses of engagement, by Victoria A. Steel, (electronic resource) represents a specific, individual, material embodiment of a distinct intellectual or artistic creation found in University of Missouri-St. Louis Libraries.
This item is available to borrow from all library branches.
- Summary
- As a relatively new term applied to the activities of higher education, "engagement" is an emerging conception that is being constructed and defined by actors within and outside of higher education. These constructions can be linked to one of two legitimizing discourses regarding the role and purpose of higher education as a whole - epistemological and political (Brubacher, 1982). Nested into the political perspective are three distinct themes for how higher education should meet its social or public service mission - civic education, collaboration, or public service (Kezar, 2005). Currently, systems and measures for evaluating engagement are being developed. The activity and process of evaluation defines measures, refines concepts, directs resources and shapes policy. Thus, the discourses that are invoked to support the evaluation of engagement and the construction and selection of the measures are simultaneously revealing and setting the boundaries for problem and solution conceptualization. Using discourse analysis, this study examined two systems - the North Central Association-Higher Learning Commission and the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Gee's (1999) tools of inquiry were assimilated with Barnetson and Cutright's (2000) typology of performance indicators to develop engagement evaluation tools of inquiry, which revealed the multi-faceted ways in which the concept of engagement is being constructed and evaluated by different stakeholders
- Language
- eng
- Extent
- 1 online resource (x, 194 pages)
- Note
-
- Title from PDF of title page (University of Missouri--Columbia, viewed on March 1, 2010)
- The entire thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file; a non-technical public abstract appears in the public.pdf file
- Dissertation advisor: Dr. Peggy Placier
- Vita
- Label
- Evaluating the engaged institution : the conceptualizations and discourses of engagement
- Title
- Evaluating the engaged institution
- Title remainder
- the conceptualizations and discourses of engagement
- Statement of responsibility
- by Victoria A. Steel
- Language
- eng
- Summary
- As a relatively new term applied to the activities of higher education, "engagement" is an emerging conception that is being constructed and defined by actors within and outside of higher education. These constructions can be linked to one of two legitimizing discourses regarding the role and purpose of higher education as a whole - epistemological and political (Brubacher, 1982). Nested into the political perspective are three distinct themes for how higher education should meet its social or public service mission - civic education, collaboration, or public service (Kezar, 2005). Currently, systems and measures for evaluating engagement are being developed. The activity and process of evaluation defines measures, refines concepts, directs resources and shapes policy. Thus, the discourses that are invoked to support the evaluation of engagement and the construction and selection of the measures are simultaneously revealing and setting the boundaries for problem and solution conceptualization. Using discourse analysis, this study examined two systems - the North Central Association-Higher Learning Commission and the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Gee's (1999) tools of inquiry were assimilated with Barnetson and Cutright's (2000) typology of performance indicators to develop engagement evaluation tools of inquiry, which revealed the multi-faceted ways in which the concept of engagement is being constructed and evaluated by different stakeholders
- Cataloging source
- MUU
- http://library.link/vocab/creatorName
- Steel, Victoria A
- Degree
- Ph.D.
- Dissertation year
- 2009.
- Granting institution
- University of Missouri--Columbia
- Illustrations
- illustrations
- Index
- no index present
- Literary form
- non fiction
- Nature of contents
-
- dictionaries
- bibliography
- theses
- http://library.link/vocab/relatedWorkOrContributorName
- Placier, Peggy
- http://library.link/vocab/subjectName
-
- Service learning
- Active learning
- Target audience
- specialized
- Label
- Evaluating the engaged institution : the conceptualizations and discourses of engagement, by Victoria A. Steel, (electronic resource)
- Note
-
- Title from PDF of title page (University of Missouri--Columbia, viewed on March 1, 2010)
- The entire thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file; a non-technical public abstract appears in the public.pdf file
- Dissertation advisor: Dr. Peggy Placier
- Vita
- Bibliography note
- Includes bibliographical references
- Carrier category
- online resource
- Carrier category code
-
- cr
- Carrier MARC source
- rdacarrier
- Content category
- text
- Content type code
-
- txt
- Content type MARC source
- rdacontent
- Control code
- 607908383
- Extent
- 1 online resource (x, 194 pages)
- Form of item
- electronic
- Media category
- computer
- Media MARC source
- rdamedia
- Media type code
-
- c
- Other physical details
- illustrations
- Specific material designation
- remote
- System control number
- (OCoLC)607908383
- Label
- Evaluating the engaged institution : the conceptualizations and discourses of engagement, by Victoria A. Steel, (electronic resource)
- Note
-
- Title from PDF of title page (University of Missouri--Columbia, viewed on March 1, 2010)
- The entire thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file; a non-technical public abstract appears in the public.pdf file
- Dissertation advisor: Dr. Peggy Placier
- Vita
- Bibliography note
- Includes bibliographical references
- Carrier category
- online resource
- Carrier category code
-
- cr
- Carrier MARC source
- rdacarrier
- Content category
- text
- Content type code
-
- txt
- Content type MARC source
- rdacontent
- Control code
- 607908383
- Extent
- 1 online resource (x, 194 pages)
- Form of item
- electronic
- Media category
- computer
- Media MARC source
- rdamedia
- Media type code
-
- c
- Other physical details
- illustrations
- Specific material designation
- remote
- System control number
- (OCoLC)607908383
Library Locations
-
St. Louis Mercantile LibraryBorrow it1 University Blvd, St. Louis, MO, 63121, US38.710138 -90.311107
-
-
University ArchivesBorrow it703 Lewis Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, US
-
University of Missouri-St. Louis Libraries DepositoryBorrow it2908 Lemone Blvd, Columbia, MO, 65201, US38.919360 -92.291620
-
University of Missouri-St. Louis Libraries DepositoryBorrow it2908 Lemone Blvd, Columbia, MO, 65201, US38.919360 -92.291620
-
Ward E Barnes Education LibraryBorrow it8001 Natural Bridge Rd, St. Louis, MO, 63121, US38.707079 -90.311355
Library Links
Embed
Settings
Select options that apply then copy and paste the RDF/HTML data fragment to include in your application
Embed this data in a secure (HTTPS) page:
Layout options:
Include data citation:
<div class="citation" vocab="http://schema.org/"><i class="fa fa-external-link-square fa-fw"></i> Data from <span resource="http://link.umsl.edu/portal/Evaluating-the-engaged-institution--the/89huS0-CDrw/" typeof="Book http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/Item"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a href="http://link.umsl.edu/portal/Evaluating-the-engaged-institution--the/89huS0-CDrw/">Evaluating the engaged institution : the conceptualizations and discourses of engagement, by Victoria A. Steel, (electronic resource)</a></span> - <span property="potentialAction" typeOf="OrganizeAction"><span property="agent" typeof="LibrarySystem http://library.link/vocab/LibrarySystem" resource="http://link.umsl.edu/"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a property="url" href="http://link.umsl.edu/">University of Missouri-St. Louis Libraries</a></span></span></span></span></div>
Note: Adjust the width and height settings defined in the RDF/HTML code fragment to best match your requirements
Preview
Cite Data - Experimental
Data Citation of the Item Evaluating the engaged institution : the conceptualizations and discourses of engagement, by Victoria A. Steel, (electronic resource)
Copy and paste the following RDF/HTML data fragment to cite this resource
<div class="citation" vocab="http://schema.org/"><i class="fa fa-external-link-square fa-fw"></i> Data from <span resource="http://link.umsl.edu/portal/Evaluating-the-engaged-institution--the/89huS0-CDrw/" typeof="Book http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/Item"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a href="http://link.umsl.edu/portal/Evaluating-the-engaged-institution--the/89huS0-CDrw/">Evaluating the engaged institution : the conceptualizations and discourses of engagement, by Victoria A. Steel, (electronic resource)</a></span> - <span property="potentialAction" typeOf="OrganizeAction"><span property="agent" typeof="LibrarySystem http://library.link/vocab/LibrarySystem" resource="http://link.umsl.edu/"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a property="url" href="http://link.umsl.edu/">University of Missouri-St. Louis Libraries</a></span></span></span></span></div>